- Published on
Blockchain-native consent can make participation dynamic, revocable, and machine-verifiable.
All Posts
All Posts
- desci (23)
- ai (5)
- coordination (4)
- privacy (3)
- governance (3)
- infrastructure (3)
- data-marketplaces (3)
- commerce (3)
- consent (2)
- ethics (2)
- supply-chain (2)
- compliance (2)
- automation (2)
- scalability (2)
- ux (2)
- blockchain (2)
- reproducibility (2)
- protocols (2)
- infra (2)
- featured (2)
- smart-contracts (2)
- tokens (2)
- incentives (2)
- data-access (1)
- trust (1)
- wetlab (1)
- dao (1)
- labops (1)
- clinical-trials (1)
- sensors (1)
- biosignals (1)
- global-health (1)
- pharma-integrity (1)
- impact (1)
- regulation (1)
- clinical (1)
- gas (1)
- blockchain-costs (1)
- genetics (1)
- precision-medicine (1)
- personalized-health (1)
- data-consent (1)
- irb (1)
- risk (1)
- data-models (1)
- rtp (1)
- research-infrastructure (1)
- inventory (1)
- legaltech (1)
- data-reuse (1)
- tokenomics (1)
- research-quality (1)
- sidechains (1)
- blockchain-infrastructure (1)
- ownership (1)
- web3 (1)
- tradsci (1)
- future-of-research (1)
- funding (1)
- mental-health (1)
- wearables (1)
- self-tracking (1)
- Published on
Blockchain lets researchers track medicine from protocol to patient, creating transparency in regions most affected by counterfeit drugs.- Published on
DeSci can simplify reporting and permission—but cannot skip accountability.- Published on
If posting a dataset costs $40, most scientists will not do it. Gas is not trivial. It is make-or-break for participation.- Published on
DeSci needs shared infrastructure—but not all science should live on a public chain.